Investor-grade preview

Five real-world investor scenarios. One consistent output standard.

Each demo represents a different buying posture. This makes the product believable to experienced investors and easy to trust for first-time users.

Evidence-led pricing contextScenario ROI and stress testingOffer ladder with risk gates

Back to website Reload this scenario

Scenario

Walk Away

BTL · Pass

Deal score

34/100

Model confidence

Gross yield

5.0%

Base scenario

Recommended offer

£228,000

Disciplined starting point

Scenario Narrative

Pass: capital-protection case. Price and risk profile fail minimum standards, so the correct decision is no deal.

Visual story: presentable photos can hide weak fundamentals, which is exactly why disciplined underwriting matters.

Proof

Proof signal: overpriced against sold context with negative cashflow under realistic assumptions.

Why It Converts

Sales angle: this scenario proves the platform protects users by filtering out attractive-looking bad deals.

Investor Deal Pack

Underwrite-ready

Cross Green Lane, Leeds LS9

LS7 2RW3 bedCapital trap: premium ask, weak downside

Score 34.0/100Offer scenario: BalancedRent estimated (72%)FreeholdEPC D

Council tax B · Reduced 2026-01-28

Asking

£265,000

Offer scenario: Balanced · £228,000

Call 0113 555 0198

Sufficient data for underwriting.

Pass candidateOverpricedNegative cashflowRisk-adjusted reject

Gross yield

6.4%

Rent £1,220/mo · Price £228,000

Flat

Net yield

4.1%

Rent £1,220/mo · Price £228,000

Flat

Cashflow

-£28/mo

Rent £1,220/mo · Price £228,000

Down

Discount vs median

-16.2%

Sold-price backed signal

Down

Listing photo1/5

Evidence

Floorplan —

EPC

Band D

Map

Area: LS7 2RW

Open map

Estimate note

Some headline figures are estimate-led until rent and sold comparables are fully confirmed.

5 photos captured

Deal pack

Fast scan

Decision-first. No fluff.

Investor brief

Verdict

Proceed(90/100 bankability)

Enough evidence to underwrite. Execution still matters.

Rent plan (+£150/mo) (packaged)

This is underwriteable. Now kill it with due diligence.

Model score 34.0/100Vs median 16.2% above

Evidence set looks complete enough to move fast.

Rent (pcm)

£1,220

Estimate-led rent until listing evidence is confirmed

Gross yield

6.4%

Scenario: Rent plan (+£150/mo) (packaged) | Rent source: openrent | certainty 72%

Net yield

4.1%

After mortgage + costs

Cashflow / mo

-£28

Net income (monthly)

Down

Market proof

Area-backed evidence

Local sold median ~£228,000

Pass candidateOverpricedNegative cashflowRisk-adjusted reject

Underwriting snapshot

Known vs. missing — so the investor trusts you.

Proceed

Asking price

£265,000

Rent input

£1,220

Used in: Rent plan (+£150/mo) (packaged)

Tenure

Freehold

Title details pending confirmation.

EPC

Band D

EPC details pending confirmation.

Market proof

Attached

Area-backed sold evidence (exact unit still pending)

Agent contact

0113 555 0198

Agent: North Leeds Residential

Council tax

Band B

Listed / Reduced

2026-01-05 / 2026-01-28

Parking / Garden

Not enough data yet / Not enough data yet

Accessibility

Not enough data yet

Broadband

Not enough data yet

EPC evidence

Band D

Map evidence

Area: LS7 2RW

Open map

Market reality check

What sold data says — and what it doesn’t.

Vs median 16.2% above

Context

Local sold median ~£228,000

Last sold: £206,000 · 2019-07-11

Vs local median

16.2% above

Sold-evidence-backed signal

Sample strength

22 area | 0 exact

More comparable sales improves pricing certainty.

Discounts can be opportunity or hidden pain. Premiums need a reason (plot, refurb, scarcity). Confirm the “why”.

AI summary

Compressed into investor language.

AI ready

Pass and move on. This scenario exists to show the engine protects capital by rejecting attractive-looking deals that fail risk-adjusted math.

Discount to local sold median with adequate sample depth · Two-reception layout supports stronger renter demand · Refurb scope is cosmetic in base case, not structural · Clear offer ceiling and walk-away line already modelled

Condition: heavy_refurbCondition certainty 68%

Multiple high-cost work indicators. Treat as heavy refurb until full survey and contractor scope are confirmed.

Red flags

Roofline and damp risk need specialist inspection.
Unknown electrical certification status.
Potential hidden capex in structural and compliance works.
Cashflow remains negative across realistic scenarios.
Premium to sold evidence has no supporting justification.
Condition risk could erase any remaining margin.

Copy/paste agent questions

Flush out deal-killers fast.

Due diligence

Any material issues affecting value, safety, or mortgageability?
Why is the vendor selling and what timescale are they working to?
Offers received so far — and why rejected?
Anything likely to fail a mortgage valuation?
Tenure/title constraints? (and if leasehold: years remaining, ground rent, service charge)

Investors don’t lose money on analysis — they lose money on assumptions. This list is designed to kill assumptions.

Next actions

Do these before you emotionally commit:

1) Confirm rent comps
3–5 true comparables. Same beds, same street feel, similar condition.
2) Confirm tenure/title constraints
Lease length, service charge, ground rent, restrictions.
3) Stress test mortgage & costs
Rate shock + voids + maintenance. Don’t underwrite optimism.
4) Works + survey plan
RICS minimum. Structural if cracks, roof movement, or moisture markers show up.

Loading Deal Pack

Preparing investor brief, scenario model, and risk view...

Ready to run this on live deals?

Activate your account and start scanning your own target area.

Choose a plan Create account