Inspect the pack before you scan
A public sample Deal Pack shows the verdict, maths, proof panels, risks, and next checks before a user pays or subscribes.
Sample Deal Pack routeOpen sample pack
Trust Centre
A serious property decision product has to prove its working.
PropertyScout should not rely on vague claims or borrowed review logos. The public site now points buyers to inspectable product proof, number-checking rules, clear review policy, and transparent commercial terms.
Inspectable proof surfaces
No fake testimonials
Private feedback separated from public reviews
Trust receipts
Show proof people can inspect, not claims they have to believe.
PropertyScout should earn trust through visible product evidence: sample packs, proof cases, method notes, private result links, and clear review rules.
Compare multiple proof cases
The proof library shows the same decision standard across BTL, BRR, flip, HMO, and walk-away cases.
Curated proof libraryView proof cases
Check the method behind the numbers
The method page explains how PropertyScout separates observed evidence, estimates, proxy support, and missing checks.
Numbers methodologyRead the method
Use one listing without subscribing
The one-off analysis flow sends a private result link by email so the buyer can return to the analysis without taking a plan.
Private one-off result linkAnalyse one listing
Public reviews are optional
Review prompts should only appear after meaningful product use, and good, bad, or mixed feedback must be acceptable.
Private feedback stays private
Trial exit feedback and product requests go into the admin feedback queue; they are not treated as public testimonials.
No fake social proof
Until named users, case studies, or partner quotes are approved, the public site should rely on inspectable product proof.
Legal and pricing stay visible
Pricing, terms, privacy, refunds, and disclaimers are linked before checkout so buyers can check the commercial terms.
Commercial transparency
PropertyScout is a decision-support product, not financial advice or a guaranteed-return service. Pricing, terms, refund policy, privacy, and disclaimers stay available before checkout.
Numbers method
Serious property decisions need evidence, not guesswork.
PropertyScout is being shaped around one rule: show what is known, show what is estimated, and keep weak proof visible before a deal looks offer-ready.
What number is directly evidenced and what is only estimated?
Would the deal still work if rent, refurb, or resale assumptions move against us?
Are flip returns shown after works and costs rather than as simple uplift?
What should the buyer, sourcer, or investor check before committing?
Source: trust centre. PropertyScout supports review and decision-making; it is not financial, legal, or tax advice.
Price context first
Asking price is checked against sold-price signals, local medians, and any exact-match evidence before the deal is presented as cheap.
Sold evidence, median gap, discount view
Rent support is labelled
Rent is separated into observed, estimated, and weak-support states so yield and cashflow do not look stronger than the rent evidence.
Rent estimate, support level, stress range
Flip profit is not uplift
Flip deals separate exit value, works, buying costs, holding costs, selling costs, net profit, ROI, and break-even sale price.
Profit after works, net profit, ROI
Costs are visible
Stamp duty, refurb, finance assumptions, fees, and buffers stay visible so a strong headline number can be challenged quickly.
SDLT, works budget, finance and fees
Source found
Observed
Facts pulled from the listing, floorplan, EPC, photos, map, sold prices, or saved evidence.
Model support
Estimated
Rent, refurb, valuation, cashflow, or strategy assumptions that are useful but still need checking.
Nearest support
Proxy-backed
Useful market signals where an exact match is not available, such as nearby solds or broad rent context.
Do not rely yet
Missing
Evidence gaps that should block confidence until the user, agent, solicitor, lender, or viewing confirms them.
Review policy
Reviews should follow product use, not replace product proof.
The app can still use public review platforms later, but the stronger conversion move is to show buyers the work first: packs, proof cases, checks, emails, and terms.
Ask for honest public reviews only after meaningful usage signals.
Keep private feedback in the internal feedback queue unless a user explicitly approves a public quote.
Do not publish anonymous claims as if they are verified customer outcomes.
Use named case studies only when permission, context, and screenshots are clean.